SKIP TO MAIN CONTENT
← Rights Hub
LEGAL REFERENCE

Case Law Library

22 landmark civil rights cases — what courts decided and what it means for you in plain English.

TRAFFIC STOP1968
Terry v. Ohio
392 U.S. 1 (1968)

A police officer can stop and pat you down if they have a specific, articulable reason to suspect you of criminal activity — not just a hunc

TRAFFIC STOP2000
Illinois v. Wardlow
528 U.S. 119 (2000)

Running away from police, especially in an area known for crime, can give officers enough reason to stop you. However, the Court noted that

TRAFFIC STOP2015
Rodriguez v. United States
575 U.S. 348 (2015)

Police cannot extend a traffic stop beyond the time needed to deal with the original reason for stopping you — like writing a ticket — just

RECORDING POLICE2011
Glik v. Cunniffe
655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011)

You have a constitutional right to record police officers performing their duties in public. This right was clearly established enough that

RECORDING POLICE2012
ACLU v. Alvarez
679 F.3d 583 (7th Cir. 2012)

Illinois tried to use its wiretapping law to prosecute people who recorded police. The court struck this down, ruling that recording police

RECORDING POLICE2017
Fields v. City of Philadelphia
862 F.3d 353 (3d Cir. 2017)

You have the right to record police activity even if you are just a bystander. You do not have to be personally involved in or affected by w

TRAFFIC STOP2013
Floyd v. City of New York
959 F. Supp. 2d 540 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

The court found that NYC police were stopping Black and Latino people at dramatically higher rates than white people without adequate justif

EXCESSIVE FORCE1989
Graham v. Connor
490 U.S. 386 (1989)

Whether police used too much force is judged by what a "reasonable officer" would have done given the circumstances at the moment force was

EXCESSIVE FORCE1985
Tennessee v. Garner
471 U.S. 1 (1985)

Police cannot shoot a fleeing suspect just because they're running away. They can only use deadly force to stop a fleeing person if that per

EXCESSIVE FORCE2007
Scott v. Harris
550 U.S. 372 (2007)

When a fleeing suspect poses a serious threat to others (like driving recklessly at high speed), police can use significant force to stop th

SEARCH SEIZURE1967
Katz v. United States
389 U.S. 347 (1967)

The government needs a warrant to listen to your private communications even in a public place if you have a reasonable expectation of priva

SEARCH SEIZURE2005
Illinois v. Caballes
543 U.S. 405 (2005)

If you're lawfully stopped for a traffic violation, police can use a drug-sniffing dog around the outside of your car without a warrant — as

SEARCH SEIZURE1991
Florida v. Bostick
501 U.S. 429 (1991)

Police can approach you on a bus, train, or in other public places, ask questions, and ask for permission to search — without any reason to

MIRANDA1966
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (1966)

Before police question you after you're arrested, they must tell you: you have the right to remain silent, anything you say can be used agai

MIRANDA2010
Berghuis v. Thompkins
560 U.S. 370 (2010)

Staying quiet is not enough — you must clearly and explicitly say "I am invoking my right to remain silent" or "I want a lawyer." If you eve

MIRANDA2013
Salinas v. Texas
570 U.S. 178 (2013)

If you're not under arrest and police are questioning you, simply going silent when asked an incriminating question can be used against you

SEARCH SEIZURE1985
New Jersey v. T.L.O.
469 U.S. 325 (1985)

Schools can search students with less justification than police need. But the search must be reasonable: school officials need a reasonable

SEARCH SEIZURE2018
Carpenter v. United States
585 U.S. 296 (2018)

Police generally need a warrant to get your cell phone location history from your carrier. The government cannot simply subpoena your phone

EXCESSIVE FORCE2009
Pearson v. Callahan
555 U.S. 223 (2009)

Police officers are protected by 'qualified immunity' — you can only sue them if they violated a 'clearly established' constitutional right.

EXCESSIVE FORCE1989
City of Canton v. Harris
489 U.S. 378 (1989)

Cities can be sued for civil rights violations when they fail to properly train officers and that failure leads to a constitutional violatio

SEARCH SEIZURE2016
Utah v. Strieff
579 U.S. 232 (2016)

If police stop you illegally but then discover you have an outstanding warrant, any evidence found during the resulting search may still be

SEARCH SEIZURE2011
Kentucky v. King
563 U.S. 452 (2011)

If police knock on your door, you hear them, and then they hear sounds suggesting evidence is being destroyed, they can enter without a warr

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Case summaries are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney for advice specific to your situation.